Chris Madge & Co

Chartered Accountants

 
  • Home
  • Tax Investigations
    Litigation Support &

    Forensic Accounting

     
  • Company Profile
  •  
  • Services
  • Tax Investigations
    Litigation Support &

    Forensic Accounting

     
  • Cases
  • Tax Investigations
    Litigation Support &

    Forensic Accounting

     
  • Contact Us
  •  
  • Careers
  • Cases

    We have set out below examples of cases dealt with by this Firm.

    Tax Investigations

    • HMRC alleged omissions of £520,000 on two Indian Restaurants following a business economic excercise. We disputed the figures and settled for £10,000.
    • Client engaged an inexperienced advisor who produced an inadequate Disclosure Report under COP9. HMRC took over the investigation and sought a settlement of £1.2m. We disputed their figures and settled case for £375,000 (which included penalties and interest).
    • HMRC commenced legal proceedings against an Accountant for a VAT fraud. We were able to persuade HMRC to accept a Compound Settlement and the Client avoided prosecution and publicity.
    • Revenue alleged omitted profits of some £700,000 and took the case before the General Commissioners. Following our representations, the Commissioners accepted our contentions that the omitted profits were £135,000.
    • In a COP9 investigation, a business had unvouched cash expenditure of £850,000 over a number of years. Based on a business economic exercise we obtained agreement to £600,000 being allowable, potentially saving the Client in tax, interest and penalties a like amount.

    Tax Compliance

    • HMRC alleged Client had substantial tax liabilities on Capital Gains although Client claimed non-domicile. We obtained retrospective clearance of non-domicile status and removed liabilities.
    • The Revenue alleged the subcontractors of a large building contracting firm were employees and presented the Company with a NIC liability of over £300,000. We represented the Client and the Revenue ultimately accepted the Status of the subcontractors as being Self Employed resulting in a nil settlement.
    • A husband and wife partnership had existed for many years, but for tax purposes the husband had been treated as a "Sole Trader". As a result we lodged an "Error and Mistake Claim" which was accepted and resulted in a substantial tax repayment.